The Ten Key Parts In Election Day

From dcwiki
Revision as of 06:50, 20 June 2021 by Wrhelbdruw (talk | contribs) (Created page with "<br> Fann assured him that the state Senate was "doing everything legally possible to get the forensic audit done" and that they planned to sue the Maricopa County Board of Su...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Fann assured him that the state Senate was "doing everything legally possible to get the forensic audit done" and that they planned to sue the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors. The cyber security firm hired by the Republican-led Arizona Senate to audit Maricopa County’s 2020 election results on Sunday told a state Superior Court judge (who has now recused himself) that the company couldn’t divulge its recount procedures amid concerns that the entire ordeal is nothing more than a partisan stunt aimed at fueling false claims of widespread election fraud, the Arizona Republic reported. Washington, DC - Since Election Day has passed, a lot of attention has been focused on the oversight of voting technology and the companies who manufacturer these systems. The testing encompasses security, accuracy, functionality, accessibility, usability, and privacy based on requirements in the EAC’s Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG). The full testing cycle, from test plan creation to final determination of a system’s suitability for federal certification, is managed by the EAC’s Testing and Certification program and closely monitored for adherence to all applicable standards. Additionally, the application for registration requires that manufacturers agree to the Testing and Certification program’s requirements and quality monitoring program as outlined in the Testing and Certification Manual.


There are currently eight active manufacturers registered with the EAC’s program. Finally, there are numerous post-Election Audit related audits that are performed by election officials to both verify the completeness and the accuracy of the vote. There are currently two accredited voting system test laboratories. Below is a summary of the EAC’s role in the testing and certification of voting systems. EAC also accredits testing laboratories and certifies voting systems, as well as administers the use of HAVA funds. With that simple system-for which our election officials already have all the technology they need-any would-be malefactor will need two entirely different sets of means and opportunity to mess with the results-one to hack the voting machines and the other to manipulate the hand-counted audits. These post-election audits also help ensure the proper functioning of voting equipment. These tests utilize manually created voting patterns that are tested on voting devices to ensure the expected result is accurately reported.


Additionally, jurisdictions perform a series of tests that include logic and accuracy testing prior to the use of voting machines in polling places. To apply for EAC certification, a voting system manufacturer must first register with the agency. We, as the only federal agency completely dedicated to election administration, have confidence in the state and local election administrators who ran the 2020 Election Audit and the voting systems certified by the EAC. It is an independent, bipartisan commission charged with ensuring secure, accurate and accessible elections by developing guidance to meet HAVA requirements, adopting voluntary voting system guidelines, and serving as a national clearinghouse of information on election administration. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) was approved by Chairman Ben Hovland, Vice Chair Don Palmer, Commissioner Thomas Hicks, and Commissioner Christy McCormick. The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) is an independent, bipartisan commission charged with facilitating secure, accurate, and accessible elections by developing guidelines to meet the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) requirements, adopting voluntary voting system guidelines, testing voting systems, accrediting test laboratories, and serving as a national clearinghouse of information on election administration.


The training period happened to coincide with the lead up to the 2004 presidential election, and young Americans’ eagerness to participate in the American Idol voting process stood in stark contrast to their dismal turn-out in governmental elections. Initially, Olson thought of the project as a critical exploration of American Idol itself. " Marisa Olson wrote this in her diary on July 16, 2004, and uploaded it to her new blog several days later. In fall 2004, artist and curator Marisa Olson decided to audition for the television show American Idol as an art project. Olson involved followers in her audition process, using pop culture participation as a way of encouraging political participation in the run-up to the 2004 US Presidential election. Over the ensuing months, Olson posted regularly about her training process. The Arizona audit - which includes a hand recount of over two million ballots - has reflected bitter partisan divisions in the state, with Republicans and Democrats squaring off in a series of volleys over the conduct of the audit and the political fallout surrounding it.